In this drawing, you see that my elements are positioned differently. (for example, the addition of the element in different directions, and in some places where they intersect with each other in different directions.) As a result, intersecting volumes are formed which are variations of each other.
The purpose of this assignment was to intersect the volumes formed in the model. Of course, it was important to show this in our model by using design operations. This time our operations were obvious: scale, rotation and add. Thanks to some of the operations given to us, we created our first model either as a surface model or as a line model. Firstly, I created intersecting volumes with the surface model. I chose to use elements that are large in size because I didn’t want to worry about scaling up these elements, and I wanted to see the volumes formed with the big elements more easily and intersect other volumes easily. In addition, they wanted to create a second model with the diagram of the model we first worked on. The first model was the model of the surface, this time would work with the line model; The first model was the model of the line, but this time it would work with the surface model. This time, the second model could explain how the operations shown in the diagram of the previous model came together.
In this assignment, we wanted to draw our previous orthographic drawing in the same way with the help of AutoCAD. In this way, we wanted to increase our ability to use AutoCAD.
The reason why this assignment was easier than the other was that the reference lines did not shift in any way, and the measurements matched the 3 views.
What they really wanted from this assignment was the fact that our photoshop skills were increased so we could see how photography and writing were positioned in a poster. For this reason, the ARCH 101 was designed to create a poster with a shortly (at least 150 words) knowledge about the building we were working with, in harmony with each other (surface, volume or mass) abstract model of this building. While I was doing the poster, I made reference to some elements and painting, but I couldn’t manage to align the painted area with the writing I wrote but I still think I did a good job despite my first attempt.
As you understand from the title, we became the pre-jury, and we were at an early stage. In this jury, we have reshaped the abstract models we originally created with the addition to design operations. We have used at least 3 design operations in each model and we have shown our diagrams how we model with the operations we use.
The only thing missing in our diagrams was how these operations came together with the elements.
The most basic education given to us in the first year was to do abstract works with design operations. First, before the abstract study, a group was formed and each group was given important architectural structures. The structure given to our group was Le Corbusier’s, Ronchamp Chapel.
First of all, if you want to have a more comprehensive knowledge of the building, I would like to share with you a link to the informational text written by an expert. This link: https://www.archdaily.com/84988/ad-classics-ronchamp-le-corbusier
Secondly, we had to do a good building analysis before we started to the building given to us by our instructors. While the roof and facades of the building were not orthogonal, they have many slopes. At the same time, the interior of the building was divided within itself (3 chapels and a church entrance).
And as we began to abstract our building, we used the concepts of mass, line, volume, and surface that we had learned before. As a group, we worked abstraction with mass, volume and line concepts. Because these concepts, our building is more comfortable to tell the existing stance.
In the 3 abstract structures we made, we took the slope in our building as a reference.
And they wanted, we prepared a diagram of the models. (However, the images you see in these images do not express the diagram because we didn’t know what the diagram was and how we prepared it. You can see an example of an understandable diagram in the next post.)
The aim of the orthographic drawing in this was that the references of the object we draw were consistent with the reference of the top, front and side views. Below is the orthographic drawing of a puncher and the scale is 1/1.
bensuacarakcayy.wordpress.com 